LIG Audit Status
This page is public. The editing interface lives at /cgi-bin/audit.cgi and requires login. Full-text AI processing status is at /cgi-bin/fulltext-status.cgi; paper upload is at /cgi-bin/fulltext-upload.cgi.
Batch audit-20260421-labels-seed42 · created 2026-04-21 07:03 · seed 42
caucasian
25 reviewed / 25 total
0 pending
Confirmed caucasian 25 · Not caucasian on review 0
white
25 reviewed / 25 total
0 pending
Confirmed white 24 · Not white on review 1
european
10 reviewed / 25 total
15 pending
Confirmed european 10 · Not european on review 0
other
25 reviewed / 25 total
0 pending
Confirmed other 25 · Not other on review 0
none of these labels
0 reviewed / 100 total
100 pending
Confirmed none of these labels 0 · Uses tracked labels on review 0
["Implementing family health history risk stratification in primary care: Impact of guideline criteria on populations and resource demand"]
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics · 2014 · article 98789988 · 10.1002/ajmg.c.31388
Review target: white. Review status: reviewed
Audit result: confirmed white · reviewer georgina · 2026-05-19 21:56
Classifier flags: white
<jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>The Genomic Medicine Model aims to facilitate patient engagement, patient/provider education of genomics/personalized medicine, and uptake of risk‐stratified evidence‐based prevention guidelines using MeTree, a patient‐facing family health history (FHH) collection and clinical decision support (CDS) program. Here we report the number of increased risk (above population‐level risk) patients identified for breast/ovarian cancer, colon cancer, hereditary syndrome risk, and thrombosis; the prevalence of FHH elements triggering increased‐risk status; and the resources needed to manage their risk. <jats:italic>Study design</jats:italic>: hybrid implementation‐effectiveness study of adults with upcoming well‐visits in 2 primary care practices in Greensboro, NC. <jats:italic>Participants</jats:italic>: 1,184, mean age = 58.8, female = 58% (N = 694), non‐white = 20% (N = 215). <jats:italic>Increased Risk</jats:italic>: 44% (N = 523). <jats:italic>Recommendations</jats:italic>: genetic counseling = 26% (N = 308), breast MRI = 0.8% (N = 10), breast chemoprophylaxis = 5% (N = 58), early/frequent colonoscopies = 19% (N = 221), ovarian cancer screening referral = 1% (N = 14), thrombosis testing/counseling = 2.4% (N = 71). <jats:italic>FHH elements</jats:italic>: 8 FHH elements lead to 37.3% of the increased risk categorizations (by frequency): first‐degree‐relative (FDR) with polyps age ≥60 (7.1%, N = 85), three relatives with Lynch‐related cancers (5.4%, N = 65), FDR with polyps age <60 (5.1%, N = 61), three relatives on same side of family with same cancer (4.9%, N = 59), Gail score ≥1.66% (4.9%, N = 58), two relatives with breast cancer (one ≤age 50) (4.1%, N = 49), one relative with breast cancer ≤age 40 (4.1%, N = 48), FDR with colon cancer age ≥60 (1.7%, N = 20). MeTree identifies a high percentage of individuals in the general primary care population needing non‐routine risk management/prevention for the selected conditions. Implementing risk‐stratification in primary care will likely increase demand for related‐resources, particularly colon screening and GC. Understanding the prevalence of FHH elements helps predict resource needs and may aid in guideline development. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</jats:p></jats:sec>