LIG Audit Status
This page is public. The editing interface lives at /cgi-bin/audit.cgi and requires login. Full-text AI processing status is at /cgi-bin/fulltext-status.cgi; paper upload is at /cgi-bin/fulltext-upload.cgi.
Batch audit-20260421-labels-seed42 · created 2026-04-21 07:03 · seed 42
caucasian
25 reviewed / 25 total
0 pending
Confirmed caucasian 25 · Not caucasian on review 0
white
25 reviewed / 25 total
0 pending
Confirmed white 24 · Not white on review 1
european
10 reviewed / 25 total
15 pending
Confirmed european 10 · Not european on review 0
other
25 reviewed / 25 total
0 pending
Confirmed other 25 · Not other on review 0
none of these labels
0 reviewed / 100 total
100 pending
Confirmed none of these labels 0 · Uses tracked labels on review 0
["Prevalence of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) in Hong Kong Chinese population"]
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2008 · article 134424999 · 10.1002/ajmg.a.32552
Review target: other. Review status: reviewed
Audit result: confirmed other · reviewer georgina · 2026-05-26 21:45
Classifier flags: caucasian, other: ethnic Chinese; Hong Kong Chinese population
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Prosopagnosia (PA), or the inability to recognize a familiar person by the face alone, had been considered to be a rare dysfunction mainly acquired by trauma to the brain. Recently we have shown that the congenital form of PA, which was considered to be even rarer, is common in Caucasians, with a prevalence of 2.5%. As these cases were familial we coined the term Hereditary Prosopagnosia (HPA). The present study is the first systematic screening for HPA in a defined population of ethnic Chinese. In 2004–2005, 533 out of around 750 medical students of The University of Hong Kong took part in a questionnaire‐based screening. The responses of 133 students indicated that they were likely to be candidates for PA. One hundred twenty agreed for diagnostic interview. Finally we made the clinical diagnosis of PA in 10 subjects. A prevalence of 1.88% (95% CI, 1.05–2.71) is established which is in the same range as in Caucasians. We took a detailed family history of four index prosopagnosic persons and were able to further investigate the families of four probands. Each had other first‐degree relatives with the same visual cognitive dysfunction. Thus, as in the Caucasians, regular autosomal dominant inheritance might best explain the segregation pattern. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</jats:p>